Hi. My name is Jamileh, and I am a Creative Economist (a.k.a. MACER)
“So, what are you studying?” the girl sitting next to me on the plane asked. “Creative Writing and the Creative Economy!” I answered, flashing her a big smile. “Creative Writing? Wow…” “And the Creative Economy.” I reiterated. “Oh… erm, what’s that?” I won’t be exaggerating when I say I got almost exactly the same reaction from most of my friends back home, most of my family members, and most of my fellow students at Kingston University, when I told them what I’m studying. To be quite honest, I was a bit confused with the major myself. I’d ask fellow MACErs, “So guys, what do you answer when people ask you what Creative Economy is?” And I got such diverse answers that it made me feel somewhat more secure about mine. Diverse. That’s one word I’d choose if someone asked me to describe our Creative Economy class. I met individuals from all over the world, with their own mindsets and beliefs; their own ideas and goals; their own hopes and dreams. It can’t get any more diverse than this. I googled Creative Economy, to be honest, and I was taken to a website that is -seven months later- still one of my favourite websites relating to Creative Economy. “The fastest growing business in the world.” (Howkins 2001) That was the first thing that caught my eye. What also intrigued me is that when people who would ask me, “Oh, so you’re doing economy? Like money, finance, stuff like that?” I used to respond with “No, not at all…” But as time passed by, I realized that even money, finance, and certainly economy can be creative. Take Square for an example. Square was founded with a concept of making money transfer easy, in the most creative of ways. Established by the co-creator of Twitter, Jack Dorsey, Square gives anyone the chance to accept physical credit card payments through their smartphones, laptops and computers, by plugging in a tiny device; no fancy card reader, no nothing. (Roth, 2010) Now I’d say that’s pretty creative!
My story…
I wanted to tell my story the way I did throughout my blog. I wanted to share my journey, and write about it, the way I love to write the most; the way that portrays me best. Surely, I could’ve started by saying, “Once upon a time, there was this girl, who came all the way from Jordan to learn Creative Economy. She wanted it so bad that she worked very hard until she got the scholarship she always wanted. She worked for four years to build a career so that she can know exactly what to major in where her career would go with this course. She came to the United Kingdom seeking knowledge; seeking experience; seeking wisdom.” Yes. I could’ve started with that; since with storytelling, an efficient way would be to actually, well… tell your story, in a simple conventional way, and in the most traditional of senses. But I chose not to. See my specialism is Creative Writing, and I figured it would be too expected of me. And I never take the predictable road; the road too often-travelled. At least I try not to. So I didn’t go with fiction. Lord knows I was tempted, but I didn’t. Then I thought a bit more about how to tell my story throughout the past seven months. I thought maybe I should be basic. Professional. To show my maturity; how I’ve grown over the course of this, well, course, and thought I should exude a sense of professionalism and seriousness. But, who am I kidding, I am who I am and that would’ve never worked out. Eventually, I thought I’d tell my story, just the way it happened, and talk about my journey on this Creative Economy rollercoaster, just the way that I would say it. No tricks, no games (and as little sarcasm as humanly possible.) Just the truth, nothing but. I will say this though, it did start very much like any novel would; or any fairytale maybe, it started with a dream, a notion. After studying English Literature for my Bachelor’s Degree, working as a copywriter for three years in an advertising agency in Jordan, and being an editor of a magazine for one year, I set out on my journey to learn more. To be more.
Nothing will ever get in my way. I am invincible! (Sarcasm 1: Jam 0)
“Creative Writing and the Creative Economy, now that sounds absolutely perfect! I’m a creative writer, and this whole Creative Economy thing is the new trend! This is going to be a piece of cake!” Wrong. It’s been tough. Very tough. Getting out of my comfort zone like that, where I was a big fish in a small bowl, and coming to London to be a student after working for years, is a lot of things, but a piece of cake isn’t one of them! And so the journey began… and what I remember most from the very beginning of it was Corrine’s question. “What is unique about yourself?” Huh? “Ask yourselves. Take a moment, and write down what you think is unique about you.” Oh, that’s easy. I tore out a paper from my notebook, and wrote down a whole list of things that I thought were unique. I speak Arabic. I went to Greece! I’ve worked in advertising. I come from a mixed background. I have crazy ideas! Needless to say, it didn’t take long to find out that I wasn’t as unique as I thought I was. Sure, I did have novel ideas, I had innovative thinking, but God there were so many new things I had to learn it was insane. The first month on the course was very challenging. Reality had slapped me on the face on so many different occasions, it gave room for low self-esteem to creep into my life, take over and hog all my personal space. It attacked any shred of confidence I had left from years past.
There’s a light at the end of the tunnel, no really…
I had to snap out of it eventually. I had to remind myself why I came here in the first place. Once I got into the routine, things started to fall into place. I have finally become part of a group; a lovely group I might add, and my confidence started building again. I realized that I too had bright ideas, things to share with the group, with my classmates, and more importantly, I had work experience. That came in very handy within my team, and I started getting some self esteem back. I realized that for starters, the Creative Economy can be quite subjective. It is a mindset; the way we think. There is no right and wrong, and that’s one of the main reasons why I chose to study Creative Economy rather than do an MBA, for an example. “The main question of our age is how we live our lives. As we struggle with this, we face other questions. How do we handle ideas and knowledge, both our own and other people’s? What relationship to ideas do we want? Where do we want to think?” (Howkins 2009). I loved this opening paragraph of Creative Ecologies. “How do we handle ideas and knowledge?” (IBID) It spoke to me. And I started acting accordingly. We began the brainstorming sessions on what our business was going to be about, and I kept reminding myself; how do I want to handle these ideas? What can I do with them?
Do not fight Temptation…
From an idea, came Temptation; our business. It was going to be the one constant in our course for the next six months; a food magazine for students living in Kingston. And ever since Temptation was born; every week, we had a team meeting to work on our business. I started getting to know my team members, but also started to get to know myself. I have worked in teams before, but there’s always something new to learn about yourself. According to Belbin’s Team Roles (2010), I categorized myself as someone who takes a bit of every role. And that could be a good and bad thing; depending on how you look at it. I just felt that I was a bit of a Shaper, Completer, and Evaluator; and felt that I was a lot of a Coordinator and sSecialist. (IBID) All my years as an adult, I felt that I was always in between; I was something of everything, and nothing of something. If that even makes sense. The fact that I’m doing a joint masters programme, that basically combines art and business, I just learned to accept that it’s a good thing to be a bit of everything. It’s not always so horrible being in between; if anything, and as cliché as that might sound, I just might end up getting the best of both worlds if I work hard for it.
Have I grown? Grrrr…
Corrine asked us in class after the winter holidays, where do we see ourselves in five years? And in my blog I wrote… “In five years time, I want to be the CEO of my own copywriting agency, or the director of a newspaper, editor of a magazine, just something that has to do with holding a senior position in the area that I love: words.” According to the GROW model (MindTools, 2010) Corrine did an amazing job directing us towards our goals. “You help your team member decide where they are going (their Goal) and establish where they currently are (their Current Reality). Then you explore various ways (the Options) of making the journey. In the final step, establishing the Will, you ensure your team member is committed to making the journey and is prepared for the conditions and obstacles they may meet on their way” (IBID) I was able to define my goal from the beginning, (where I want to be five years from now, one year from now even) and realized where I currently stand and what I need in order to get to it. So what I initially gained from this course was the tools that helped me think, experiment with and explore the ideas that would possibly turn into the reality that is my goal. But does that mean I needed a leader to grow? Did I need someone to lead me into thinking this way? It all depends on how you look at it really. We had Corrine as the primary leader, definitely; and that helped in the growing process. But within the team itself, we technically didn’t have one leader throughout the whole process, but rather each of us being a leader within our own domain. There was a lot of talk about leadership in the beginning of the second semester. The term leadership has been referred to, used and abused in so many different contexts, discourses, clichés, and meanings. Getting even closer to reality, the whole leadership bonanza got me thinking about our group. There was one exercise we did with Piers Ibbotson (2010) where we were split into groups, and each group had a different functionality relating to leadership. One group had its members representing higher levels of management, another with a typical hierarchy you’d find in almost any corporation (senior management, middle management, juniors, etc…) and another group had members all equally competent, good at what they do, but no one was anyone’s boss. Piers wanted to see (and wanted us to acknowledge) which group functioned the best, and consequently, who achieved the best results in the task that we were given. That’s when it hit me. It could be that I’m old-fashioned, I have a classic way of thinking, or simply that this is the only way I know how, but it seemed to me that the best way of getting things done is when there is a leader, there are dependable experts, and also there are aspiring ambitious juniors that needed to start from the very beginning (i.e. do all the donkey work!) How does that concern me? On some level I believe I did want a leader for Temptation, and concurrently I’ve had the urge to lead. But on the other hand, we did quite well as a team, each with their equal responsibilities, each knowing what they have to do, that maybe it wasn’t necessary. True at some point the drive slowed down, the enthusiasm candle burnt down, and the energy levels deflated, and typically, in the hierarchy that I’ve been used to, this was when you go to your boss for encouragement. And at the same time, this is when the leader gathers the troops, the coach gathers his team, the teacher gathers her students, and rebuilds what has been broken. I think this is what our group was lacking. And on a more philosophical note, is that what was actually missing? I mean, do we really need a leader in order to succeed? Does a nation need a leader to survive?
Fail often and… wait, what?
When Corrine first told us about IDEO’s “unorthodox prototyping model – described by its founder as “fail early and often to succeed sooner” (Sosa, M & Bhavani, R. 2005), it took me a while to relate to it. Sure, we weren’t successful as a business from the beginning, but it was difficult to understand how businesses would want to fail often when they first start. Wouldn’t that put a damper on their morals? But I did eventually understand the concept behind it. It is after all being realistic, and choosing to realizing that it is better to fail in the beginning when you don’t have much to lose, rather than to fail later on in the process. It was kind of like a mother telling her daughter, “Look, if you’re going to be dating, at least bring him over so I can meet him first.” That way… she’s keeping an eye on things and cutting her losses. On the other hand, IDEO’s ‘Project Journey’, (IBID) which consists of the five fundamental steps: Observe, Synthesize, Generate Ideas, Refine, Implement, that I could relate to straight away. That’s how the creative process took place in Young & Rubicam, where I used to work. The account planner would enter a brief through traffic to the creative department; copywriters and art directors would meet with the creative director and discuss the brief. We’d brainstorm and then each group would set out to “Observe, Synthesize, Generate Ideas, Refine, and then Implement them.” A mental storm… What I found out through my research here is that it’s efficient to ‘brainstorm’ by yourself as well as with others, at least at first; to think of a few ideas and several directions before you meet with the group. Research showed that “people are ‘more creative’ when they ‘brainstorm’ alone rather than in meetings.” (Sutton, 2006) And that’s what I believe we didn’t do much of in Temptation. We always got together first and then started to brainstorm. Another thing that I found to be efficient in brainstorming is where you actually do it. We talked about this in Corrine’s class, how some people preferred our classes when they took place at Innoversity, and believed it gave them room to creatively let their imaginations run wild. “The modular space is fun because it can accommodate different group sizes and configurations easily. When play and movement are encouraged the blood gets flowing and innovative ideas follow.” (The D School, 2010) I’m the boss of me. Yes I am! What surprised me most about myself after taking this course is the fact that I now want to do my own thing once I graduate. OK maybe not straight away, I do want to apply to some creative agencies, advertising agencies, maybe magazines and newspapers, but I am surprised in terms of my willingness to actually do this. Like really do it! Ever since Corrine asked that one question in class, “So who here wants to do their own thing once they graduate?” and I just had a “tadaaaaaaaa” moment! I do I do. It is no longer a scary thought in the very far future. The thing is, whenever anyone would ask me, I would always answer with “sure, I do think of eventually opening my own copywriting agency, or maybe my own magazine…” but if I were to be completely honest with myself, I don’t think I truly believed it. I don’t think I truly believed in myself to do it. Until now. Now that I got to experience something similar, I feel that it is doable. I want to create a brand; a powerful brand; an innovative brand. I have a long way to go, but when it comes to brands apple is my dream! It has been positioned as “the most innovative company in the world” (Thomke, Feinberg, 2009). Talk about being innovative!
The beginning of the end, but the beginning of the rest of our lives…
“April 30th” Corrine said when we asked her when our final presentation would be. And I thought, April 30th, we have a lot of time. There is so much we can do in six months; so much. But now… as I write the final words of my report, it is already May 1st; a day after our final presentations. Six months passed by so quickly! The presentation was as I hoped it would be. The term ended as I hoped it would. And most importantly, now I am more realistic. Now, I believe in myself more. Now… I feel I can do everything I want to do, but I have to plan it right. Of course, it sounds so corny, something a teacher’s pet would say. “Oh wow, now that I am done with this course, I feel like I can conquer the world. I have changed 360 degrees, and I feel like I am equipped for real life! Oh thank you, thank you!” But it is sort of true. I do feel like I have developed throughout this course. And I do feel that creating my own business isn’t something so far out of reach now; it’s doable. It’s tangible, and I plan on doing it…
Bibliography:
ChangingMinds (2010) Belbin’s Team Roles. Available at: http://changingminds.org/explanations/preferences/belbin.htm (Accessed: April 25, 2010) Howkins, J. (2001) The Creative Economy. Available at: http://www.creativeeconomy.com/think.htm (Accessed: April 20, 2010) Howkins, J. (2009) Creative Ecologies: Where Thinking is a Proper Job. United States of America. Transaction Publishers Ibbotson, P. (2008) The Illusion of Leadership. United Kingdom: Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan MindTools (2010) The GROW Model: Coaching team members to improve performance. Available at: http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_89.htm (Accessed: April 25, 2010) Roth, D. (2010) The Future of Money: It’s Flexible, Frictionless and (Almost) Free: Wired Magazine. Available at: http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_futureofmoney/ (Accessed: May 4, 2010) Sosa, M & Bhavani, R. (2005) IDEO Service Design: Management Today. Available at: http://www.managementtoday.co.uk/search/article/548074/fail-early-fail-often-ideo-service-design/ (Accessed: May 2, 2010) Sutton, R. (2006). Eight Tips for Better Brainstorming: Business Week. Available at: http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/jul2006/id20060726_517774.htm (Accessed: May 2, 2010) The D School. (2010) A Playground Space Built For “Breaking Things,” at Stanford’s d.school: Fast Company. Available at: http://www.fastcompany.com/1634217/playground-spaces-built-for-learning-at-stanfords-dschool (Accessed: May 1, 2010) Thomke, S. & Feinberg, B. (2009) Design Thinking and Innovation at Apple: Harvard Business Review. Available at: http://hbr.org/product/design-thinking-and-innovation-at-apple/an/609066-PDF-ENG (Accessed: May 4)








